Marketing and the The “All Natural” Trend

Michael Smith Blog - Know The Cause
Those of us who have been interested in health for a while are used to looking for certain things on labels. “Certified Organic” is one of the more critical things to look for when you are (obviously) trying to shop organic. 

If you get the USDA Certified Organic label, you know that the food you are getting is in compliance with the USDA’s standards for organic farming. And even though regulatory agencies often miss the mark, this is a good label that you can put some trust in.

Marketers are always coming up with new ways to encourage people to try their products, and don’t think for a moment that they don’t have a pulse on the newest health trends. This hardly bears repeating; a stroll through even the largest box retail supermarkets will reveal items listed as “Fortified with…”, “Only XX Natural Ingredients…”, or some other phrase intended to assure the consumer that they aren’t buying a box, package or bottle loaded with stuff cooked up in a lab. But most marketers, at least in my humble opinion, are masters of deception, and one of the words they commonly thrown around is the word “natural”.

Let me be clear; I think going the “natural” route is always best, and by this I mean a few things. I think foods grown in a natural way, i.e., on an organic farm, or cows fed their natural diet of grass, etc., is always best and safest. Obviously, I think “natural medicine”, or medicine that tries to avoid manmade chemicals in favor of medicines harvest from the natural world, is a great health strategy. But, there are a few things about the labeling and marketing of foods as “natural” that really get under my skin, because many lay people fall for this marketing ploy when they are new to healthy living and trying to buy food that isn’t garbage.

First of all, the natural label does NOT equal organic. Foods grown with any and every chemical can still be labeled as “natural”. If you are buying “natural” labeled chicken, for example, that doesn’t mean that the chicken was free-range, or grown without hormones or antibiotics. “Natural” is a free and easy word to throw on a label that, at least in the consumer’s mind, relieves them of any doubt about the safety or cleanliness of a product. After all, who in their right mind would want food that unnatural as opposed to natural? The word brings with it a connotation meant to lure consumers.

Second of all, “natural” doesn’t necessarily imply “safe”. I’m not saying that the foods labeled natural aren’t safe; I’m just trying to underscore the uselessness of the label. Here are some other things that are all natural: uranium, hemlock, rattlesnakes (notably their venom), aflatoxin B-1… You are beginning to get the picture. It’s not really any secret that fruits and vegetables and animals grow in the “natural” world (although, with the advent of factory farms and farming, we are quickly escaping that notion), but we don’t need the word “natural” slapped on the labeling of factory meat to project the image of some idyllic farm into the mind of the consumer when the animal wallowed in filth for its entire life. That’s deception by marketing, plain and simple.

Third, the “natural” label doesn’t imply healthy, either. A stroll down the cereal aisle is nearly comical for things like this; makers of sugary cereals will stop at nothing to peddle their wares, even labeling that garbage as “All Natural” or “Heart Healthy”.

Next time you are shopping, be sure to pay a bit closer to the label on your food; buying a food that is “all natural” doesn’t necessarily mean it is Kaufmann 1 friendly, or even healthy, for that matter.

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on reddit
Share on Reddit
Share on email
Share via Email
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

Leave a Reply